Figure 1. Tractor-Mounted shielded sprayer used for cover crop termination.

Figure 1. Tractor-Mounted shielded sprayer used for cover crop termination.

Updated: November 1, 2024
By Kurt Vollmer

Spring-Seeded Grass Cover Crops in Watermelon Production

Commercially acceptable weed control is difficult to achieve in plasticulture vegetables even with pre- and post-emergent herbicide applications. These applications often do not provide season long weed control between rows. Moreover, several weed species have become resistant to commonly used postemergence herbicides, including common ragweed and pigweed species. Cover crops are an additional tool that could be successfully integrated into a weed management program.

Objectives

  1. Evaluate the use of cover crop management tactics on weed suppression
  2. Evaluate the utility of cover crops for reducing herbicide applications and environmental impact in plasticulture systems.
  3. Demonstrate the utility of cover crops for weed management in plasticulture production.

Methods

This study was conducted at the Wye Research and Education Center in Queenstown, MD. The design was a two-factor factorial arranged in a split-plot design consisting of cover crop management and factorial subplots of cover crop species and residual herbicide treatment (Table 1). Cereal rye (240 lb a⁻¹), spring oats (277 lb a⁻¹), or cereal rye (120 lb a⁻¹) + spring oats (138 lb a⁻¹) were seeded in between plastic rows at least 4 weeks prior to transplanting watermelon. No cover crop treatments were also included for comparison. Cover crops were managed by terminating with Gramoxone (1.25 pt a⁻¹), Select Max (16 oz a⁻¹), or no herbicide (rolled-only). Residual herbicide treatments consisted of Reflex (24 oz a⁻¹) + Dual Magnum (1.67 pt a⁻¹) or no residual herbicide.

Cover crops were terminated 3 weeks after transplanting (WATr) using a tractor-mounted shielded sprayer (Figure 1). However, additional crimping was required and achieved with a second tractor pass without an herbicide application. Residual herbicides were applied using a hooded backpack sprayer 24 hours after cover crop termination. All plots were evaluated for weed density and crop response.

Table 1. Cover crop and herbicide treatments

Cover Crop Managment Cover Crop Species Residual Herbicide
1. Gramoxone (1.2 pt a⁻¹)

1. cereal rye (240 lb a⁻¹)

2. spring oats (277 lb a⁻¹)

3. cereal rye (120 lb a⁻¹) + spring oats (138 lb a⁻¹)

4. no cover crop

1. Reflex (1.5 pt a⁻¹) + Dual Magnum (1.67 pt a⁻¹)
2. Select Max (1 pt a⁻¹) 2. No residual herbicide
3. No herbicide (rolled)

Results

The presence of a cover crop, as well as termination method, influenced broadleaf weed density and watermelon yield. Cover crop treatments, regardless of species, reduced overall broadleaf weed density 90%, 92%, 75% compared to no cover treatments 4, 6, and 8 WATr, respectively (Figure 2). At 4 WATr, plots terminated with Gramoxone showed a 100% decrease in broadleaf weed density compared to rolled plots and plots terminated with Select Max (Figure 3). At 6 WATr, plots terminated with Gramoxone showed a 100% reduction in broadleaf weed density compared to plots treated with Select Max, but there were no significant differences among rolled-only plots. At 8 WATr, plots terminated with Gramoxone showed a 60% reduction in broadleaf weed density compared to plots terminated with Select Max and rolled-only plots.

The presence of a cover crop resulted in greater fruit number and total fruit weight than no cover crop treatments. There was a 93% and 43% reduction in fruit number with no cover and oat treatments, respectively, compared to cereal rye and cereal rye + oat treatments (Table 2). Total watermelon weight per acre showed a similar trend with no cover treatments showing 94% reduction and oat treatments showing a 51% reduction compared to cereal rye and cereal rye + spring oat treatments. Average fruit weight showed a 20% reduction with no cover and oat treatments compared to cereal rye and cereal rye + oat treatments.

Table 2. Watermelon yield response to cover crop treatments.

Cover Crop Fruit Total Wt. (lb) Average Wt. (lb)
    no a⁻¹ lb lb
None 1,163 C 4 c 10 b
Oats 9,633 b 31 b 11 b
Rye 18,103 a 67 a 13 a
Rye + Oats 15, 804 a 59 a 13 a
Means for the dame column followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Fisher's LSD (a = 0.05)

Discussion

These results show that seeding a grass cover crop in the spring can be used as an effective weed management tool. All cover crops were successful in reducing broadleaf weed density. However, cover crop selection appears to be related to yield. Yield parameters were lower with oats compared to cereal rye and oats + cereal rye. This could be the result of oats producing more biomass, which could have negatively affected watermelon growth compared to cereal rye and cereal rye + oats (Figures 4 and 5). Gramoxone appears to be the most effective herbicide for both terminating the cover crop and providing additional weed control. Both Select Max and rolling/crimping can be used to terminate a grass cover crop, but neither of these methods can be used to control emerged broadleaf weeds. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and help identify consistent treatments.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Crop Protection and Pest Management, Applied Research and Development Program through award #2020-70006-33016. The author would also like to thank the horticultural farm crew at the UMD Wye Research and Education Center for their assistance in implementing this project.

This article appears on November 1, 2021, Volume 12, Issue 7 of the Vegetable and Fruit News  

Vegetable and Fruit News, November 2021, Vol. 12, Issue 7

Vegetable and Fruit News is a statewide publication for the commercial vegetable and fruit industries and is published monthly during the growing season (April through October). Subscribers will receive an email with the latest edition.

Subscribe