FS-1127 | July 2020
Evaluation of the Performance of a Soy Protein Seed Lubricant in Corn and Soybeans
University of Maryland evaluated the performance of a new seed lubricant product called DUST (Low Mu Tech, Calamus, IA, www.lowmutech.com) on corn and soybeans against two common seed lubricants, graphite and Fluency (Bayer Crop Science, USA) in 2019. Seed lubricants are materials mixed in with seed in the boxes of planters to ease the flow of seed through the planter and decrease wear in these mechanisms, especially in planters utilizing finger pickup units. DUST is a soy protein lubricant which is a cleaner alternative to commonly available seed lubricants. Graphite, for example, can leave a dark-colored residue on planter box surface, user clothing, and hands. The manufacturers of DUST also reported the product contributes to early plant vigor.
We used a completely randomized design with five replicates and an untreated control treatment (UTC) to evaluate the effects of DUST, graphite, and Fluency on plant emergence, early season vigor, and grain yield in corn and soybeans at Wye Research and Education Center in Queenstown, MD. Tables 1 and 2 detail the agronomic management of corn and soybeans. Stand counts were reported as number of 1,000 plants per acre, with plants counted in a 30-foot length of one corn row and plants counted in an area the size of 1/1000 of an acre in soybean plots. We assessed early season vigor at 7, 14, and 21 days after planting (DAP) through collection of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) readings using a handheld Greenseeker sensor. The sensor was held approximately 1 meter from the surface of the ground as the operator walked down the length of one corn or soybean row per plot. Readings were collected constantly as the operator walked at a similar speed and are reported as an average of those readings.
Corn was harvested when moisture approached 15% and yields are reported in bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture. Soybeans were harvested when moisture approached 13% and yields are reported in bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture. Seed lubricant products were purchased for the evaluation and costs of use are calculated based on unit cost of product and amount of product used on a per-acre basis.
We analyzed differences among seed lubricant treatments for plant population, early season vigor, and crop yield. We used a mixed model analysis of variance with replication as a random variable using SAS 9.4 software. Coefficients of variation (CV%) are reported as a measure of variability at a test site and values less than 10% indicate enough precision existed to determine a significant difference.
Comparable Results, More Expensive per Acre
Corn did not emerge until 10 DAP so we did not collect 7 DAP measurements (Table 1). We reported no differences in emergence or yield among the treatments for either corn or soybeans (Tables 3 and 4), indicating all seed lubricants performed equally well to each other and un-amended seed. Additionally, we found no effect of seed lubricant on early season vigor observed in either corn or soybeans in 2019.
Although the DUST lubricant had the lowest unit cost (Table 5), a greater amount of the product is recommended for use. As a result, DUST is the most expensive product on a per-acre basis. Based on the data we collected in 2019, the DUST soy protein seed lubricant is comparable to other seed lubricants commonly used in Maryland for corn and soybean production.
Planted | 10 May 2019 |
Plot details | four 30” rows |
Hybrid | P0843AM |
Target population | 30,000 plants ac⁻1 |
Fertility | 46 gal of 30% UAN |
Herbicides | PRE: Scanner @ 2 pt/ac Acuron @ 2.5 qt/ac Atrazine 4L @ 1 qt /ac |
Harvest | 10 September 2019 |
Planted | 7 June 2019 |
Plot details | seven 15” rows |
Hybrid | Asgrow AG39X7 |
Target population | 160,000 plants ac⁻1 |
Herbicides | PRE: Liberty 280 SL @ 32 oz/ac Medal II @ 1.5 pt/ac Authority First DF @ 6 oz/ac Actamaster SC @ 3 lb/ac POST: Gly Star Plus @ 1 qt/ac |
Harvest | 6 November 2019 |
14 DAP | 21 DAP | 14 DAP | 21 DAP | CORN YIELD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plants ac⁻1 | NDVI | Bu ac⁻1 | |||
DUST | 28691 | 27646 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 177.7 |
Fluency | 28227 | 27414 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 162.8 |
Graphite | 27065 | 27414 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 168.8 |
UTC | 28459 | 27878 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 172.5 |
Probability >F | 0.4127 | 0.9423 | 0.2279 | 0.2492 | 0.4279 |
CV, % | 5.8 | 4.9 | 18.0 | 19.4 | 10.7 |
7 DAP | 14 DAP | 21 DAP | 7 DAP | 14 DAP | 21 DAP | YIELD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1000 Plants ac⁻1 | NDVI | Bu ac⁻1 | |||||
DUST | 16.4 | 16.8 | 19.4 | 0.26 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 78.0 |
Fluency | 16.6 | 18.4 | 18.8 | 0.28 | 0.55 | 0.44 | 73.9 |
Graphite | 15.2 | 18.2 | 17.6 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 76.6 |
UTC | 14.2 | 19.8 | 17.8 | 0.25 | 0.51 | 0.39 | 76.1 |
Probability >F | 0.6751 | 0.5442 | 0.7977 | 0.5641 | 0.8029 | 0.4188 | 0.6246 |
CV, % | 21.4 | 18.3 | 16.8 | 10.6 | 17.7 | 14.4 | 6.4 |
Corn | Soybeans | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost, $lb⁻1 | lb used ac⁻1 | $ ac⁻1 | lb used ac⁻1 | $ ac⁻1 | |
Fluency | $5.05 | 0.0058 | $0.03 | 0.0144 | $0.07 |
Graphite | $13.30 | 0.0087 | $0.11 | 0.0312 | $0.41 |
DUST | $4.41 | 0.0937 | $0.41 | 0.143 | $0.63 |
*Mass per acre was calculated based on rate recommendation for each product at the target population for the crop (i.e. 30,000 plants per ac for corn and 160,000 plants per ac for soybeans).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mr. Louis Thorne and Mr. Joe Crank, agricultural technicians in the Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, for their assistance with data collection and harvesting of these plots. Additionally, we would like to thank the farm crew at Wye Research and Education Center, especially John Draper, Joe Street, and Tom Eason, for their assistance with obtaining the products, planting, and in-season management of the plots.
DR. NICOLE FIORELLINO
nfiorell@umd.edu
This publication, Evaluation of the Performance of a Soy Protein Seed Lubricant in Corn and Soybeans (FS-1127), is a part of a collection produced by the University of Maryland Extension and the Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture within the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
The information presented has met UME peer-review standards, including internal and external technical review. For help accessing this or any UME publication contact: itaccessibility@umd.edu
For more information on this and other topics, visit the University of Maryland Extension website at extension.umd.edu
University programs, activities, and facilities are available to all without regard to race, color, sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, marital status, age, national origin, political affiliation, physical or mental disability, religion, protected veteran status, genetic information, personal appearance, or any other legally protected class.